Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Hilary and Obama, Both Less than Truthful?

I have held up on commenting on the Democrat party primary but it has become a gift that keeps on giving. First you have Obama and his non-speech last week as he attempted to distance himself from his 20 plus year association with the racist and anti Semitic Trinity Church. He might have pulled it off if had had actually denounced the Rev Wright and his rhetoric but instead we listened to another flowery speech that was meaningless. Can you imagine any Republican candidate that would have had ties to a similar church? Shoot he or she would have been under the bus the first day. Obama a highly educated man who probably initially joined the church for south side street credibility expects us to believe that he was not aware and didn’t agree of what was being said. I call B.S on this, if that was the case (1) this makes him clueless and (2) if he didn’t agree he should have taken his family and left, he didn’t and this is a problem. His inability to deal with this and his unbelievable naiveté in dealing with terrorists would and should disqualify him from the POTUS.
Then we have Hillary and her latest lies, err ah, her claims of sniper fire on her visit to Bosnia, sitting on flack jackets and corkscrewing approaches to the airfield and being told to run to the terminal. I thought this was crap from the first time it was reported last month. First off
as First Lady her travel would be a SAM, Special Airlift Mission usually conducted by the 89th Wing at Andrews. I figured that there would be no way that a SAM like this would be allowed to land if there was any threat. I thought right; tonight Rusty Humphries interviewed retired Col William “Goose” Changose who was the aircraft commander on this flight. He confirmed that there was no threat of fire, no one on his crew told anyone to sit on a flack jacket, there was no corkscrewing approach, no running to the terminal and if there was any threat he would have diverted to another airfield.
This is a good time, to think that these two are the best that the Democrat party can come up with. Now the MSM does not know what to do, who to trash and who to carry the water for. I predict Osama’s campaign will continue to come off the rails as more an more people get familiar with his real extreme left liberal voting record what little there is. At the same time the continued lies and deceit of the Clinton campaign will drive her negatives even higher among independent voters. A brokered convention in Denver could be a remake of Chicago 1968. After all Clinton needs the so-called super delegates to pull off the nomination. Can you imagine the reaction after this happened due to Obama’s un- electability and the reaction it would cause to the core leftist’s in the party? I say bring it on I’ll pop the popcorn

No comments: